My Regards to Tagore, on 25th Baishakh-1432.

INTER-FAITH
MARRIAGE
CONFLICT
BETWEEN ‘SHARIA’ & LAW
MUSLIM WOMAN
BETRAYED
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IS ONLY SOLUTION
SARASIJ MAJUMDER
A High
Court in India rejected a plea to protect a Muslim Woman and a Hindu Man. According
to Indian Law, her decision to enter
into a Live-In
Relationship with the Hindu Person is illegal under Muslim law, calling it Zina
(fornication) as well as Haram (an act
forbidden by Allah).
I intentionally withheld the names, and place, for maintaining secrecy of the persons. I Learned this from a Newspaper. Then searched the past legal instances. Refer Image above, and references below.
They
received threats against their lives from the woman’s father and her relatives.
The court handed down its judgment on this issue on February 23rd.
The
woman also appealed to the Court that
her former husband, (identified only as Mohsin) deserted her to marry another
woman two years ago, and he is currently living with his second wife. Following
their separation, the Muslim woman returned to her matrimonial home, but she
chose to enter into a live-in relationship with a Hindu Man because of being
mistreated by her father, and family.
However,
because the woman did not get any divorce from her husband and she was engaged
in a live-in relationship with a different man, the state government and the
High Court rejected their petitions for protection and even ruled that their
relationship could be characterized as both Zina (fornication) and Haram
(forbidden) under Sharia law.
RULING OF COURT:
"…….The
first petitioner is living with [the] second petitioner in contravention of the
provisions of Muslim law (Shariat), wherein legally wedded wife cannot go
outside marriage, and this act of Muslim women is defined as zina and haram, …"
“….If we go
into the criminality of the act of [the] first petitioner, she may be
prosecuted for the offense under Section 494 (marrying again during [the]
lifetime of husband or wife) and 495 (same offense with concealment of former
marriage from]m person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted) of Indian
Penal Code (IPC), as such, the relationship is not covered within the phrase of
live-in relationship or relationship in the nature of marriage, ….”
During
the hearing, the state counsel declined the woman’s plea, ruling that since the
Muslim woman did not seek divorce from her ex-husband, lived with the Hindu man
in adultery, and did not move any application to convert her religion, their
relationship could not be protected by law.
Justice
Mrs. Agarwal said, "Such a type of criminal act cannot be supported and
protected by the Court."
The
Court further added that the woman is still "Muslim by religion, and she
has not moved any application to the authority concerned for conversion of her
religion under sections 8 and 9 of the Conversion Act."
Not
only in India, in UK also, Sharia is in conflict with British legal system. I
quote----- “…there are occasions when Sharia Law conflicts with English law. Hence why
it is ever more important to look at this in the context of the English Courts…..”
REF: Islamic Marriage and the English Legal System: Nikah /Post by
Tahir Khan October 18, 2023
My
Recommendation:--
BOTH,
AT RAJASTHAN, and at PRAYAGRAJ—HC opined against such relationship. Reference
furnished below.
I
Request the RSS to be active, and undertake the following actions for all such cases. Let us work out a Social Solution within the system, for all interfaith marriages applying SANATAN DHARMA, as long as both the persons agree, till UCC is introduced:-
In case of a destitute Muslim Women---
1.0 By Wife: Talaaq-i-tafweez: Talaaq-i-tafweez is also known as delegated
divorce and is recognized by both Shias and Sunnis. This is the only way through
which a woman can give divorce to her husband but this power of giving divorce
needs to be delegated by the husband only.
2.0 Khula:A divorce with mutual consent
and at the instance of a wife in which she agrees to return mahr (obligation
paid by the groom to the bride at the time of Islamic marriage) or give some
consideration to her husband. It allows a woman to initiate a divorce.
Does she is having enough resources to
undertake this action?
3.0
Last Option:-- That
the husband has neglected or has failed to provide for her
maintenance for a period of two years.
4.0 After, and if any of the above
is fulfilled, She will be free from “NIKAH”— may get converted to Hinduism,
and either can marry, or enter into an appropriate relationship. Then there will be no legal obstacle.
THIS
CASE, AND SIMILAR PAST CASES FURTHER STRENGTHEN THE REQUIREMENT OF
UNIFORM/SECULAR CIVI CODE. IT WILL SOLVE THIS TYPE OF PROBLEMS IN INTER-FAITH
MARRIAGES, AND DIVORCE CASES.
DISCLAIMER:-- THE BLOG IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW DISRESPECT FOR ANY BODY--MUSLIM,OR HINDU, AND ANY RELIGION OR FAITH, AND JUDICIARY. Any mistake in English pronunciation of Islamic law, or word is purely unintentional, and will be corrected, when pointed out by anybody.
REFERENCES:--
2.0 AMAR
UJALA---
The case reported in NEWSPAPER, with details.
5.0 https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/supreme-court-live-in-relationships-allahabad-high-court-interfaith-couple
6.0 SHARIA-- ENGLISH TRANSLATION
7.0 IMAGE—GOOGLE.
Comments
Post a Comment