THE THREE
CHINA POLICY
INDIA SHOULD
TAKE BOLD STAND
SARASIJ
MAJUMDER
After
beaten and mauled badly in 1962, Bharat has been carefully defensive against
China. Against Chinese intrusions on the Line of Actual Control and in
Arunachal Pradesh, the traditional action of India government was limited to
PROTEST only.. China never cared about our sensibilities and continued
expanding its borders into Bharat, biting bit by bit.
Methodology
was, and is simple, but effective---
advance some BAKRIWALAS (human
Shepherds) in Indian area. They will setup a temporary settlement. India
notice, but ignores….China follows with build army infrastructure behind.
And
a part of pure INDIAN territory suddenly becomes a part of “DISPUTED AREA”.
I
CAN ONLLY HATE A COUNTRY WHO GRABS LAND THIS WAY.
Then
Galwan happened. On June 15 2020, our soldiers killed more than 80
Chinese troops in Galwan Valley and told Beijing that any such intrusions would be
dealt with more than a belt treatment. Since then, China has stopped pricking
us on LAC but has kept on building up its troops in Tibet.
In
June this year, Modi Ji may have done something silently.
He may
have tacitly okayed the Three China Policy. And this has left China fuming! Let
me explain how. This is not published anywhere, but suddenly Chinese premier
singing “PANCH-SHEEL” has some meaning, and sends some signal.
The three China policy means Bharat recognizes Taiwan as a
separate entity from China and also that Tibet is a disputed territory—and has
a right for self-Governance. This is the minimum correct stand .
Way
back in 1954, PM Nehru and Chinese Prime Minister Chou En Lai signed Panch Sheel Pact, which basically allowed Beijing to consolidate its
occupation of Tibet. Remember, China had annexed Tibet in 1950. Bharat under Nehru had meekly
looked southwards while Chinese Army
rolled into Tibet, an independent country. INDIA FAILED TIBET UNDER NEHRU.
UNO /EUROPE/USA also did
nothing.
China
wasn’t done with invading Tibet. Through the 1950s, China’s PLA overran Aksai Chin in Eastern Ladakh and occupied it. Nehru
looked the other way. He even advocated that China be counted as Permanent
Member of Security Council!
From
1960s up till now, Bharat has reconciled that Tibet belongs to China. But as of
now we see , Mr. Modi may have done something remarkable recently. And, if done, that is right.
In
June this year, an American delegation came to Bharat to meet Dalai Lama. This
team included Nancy Pelosi , author of Resolve Tibet Bill. Through this resolution, both parties (Democrats and
Republicans) want the US government to recognize Tibet as a focal point in all
talks between Washington and Beijing. In short, Resolve
Tibet Bill aims to recognize Tibet as an independent country.
What’s
important to know that this delegation also met PM Narendra Modi in DELHI,
after returning from Dharamshala (where His Holiness Dalai Lama lives).
I believe that Modi’s meeting with Pelosi and her team signals Bharat’s
willingness to treat Tibet as an issue to be resolved between New Delhi ,
USA and Beijing. So far, Bharat had
shied away from talking about this illegally occupied country by CHINA.
However,
much of PRC are illegally occupied.
THE WHOLE DEMOCRATIC WORLD,SO FAR,
DISOWNED THE TIBET, & IT’S PROBLEM.
Now
all this has left Rahul Gandhi very disturbed, and he has stepped up his attacks against
Modi. We all know that Congress and CPC (Communist Party of China) had signed
an agreement secretly. What is in that agreement? Nobody knows. Does this pact
recognize China’s claims over Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh? Is Congress acting
as an unofficial spokesperson or agent for China in Delhi?
INDIA MUST KNOW.
Disclaimer:- The above is BLOGGER’S independent interpretation, and
opinion, based on NEWSPAPER reports..
REF:
1.0
Text is hyperlinked. You can read more, if you like by clicking the hyperlinks.
2.0 Explained | What is the
Resolve Tibet Act - CNBC TV18
3.0 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-meets-us-congressional-delegation-including-former-house-speaker-nancy-pelosi/articleshow/111135641.cms
Image: GOOGLE
Comments
Post a Comment