TARA TALA WARE HOUSE FAILURE||ROLE OF MAYOR FIRHAD HAQIM
TARA TALA
WARE HOUSE FAILURE
ROLE OF MAYOR
FIRHAD HAQIM
SARASIJ
MAJUMDER
On the above, I will discuss some
minimum but most important technical points, which have legal implications.
First the cause of failure shall be
established. State Government must be getting it done by a competent company.
I will just explain a few things for
general understanding.
It may be a failure due to
ENGINEERING, or Inferior Material used, or Method of Construction adopted, and Execution
was wrong.
It may even be a combination of more
than one above.
Normally this type of BUILDING has a
combined Factor of Safety of 100%. The failure happened because even this limit
was exceeded in more than one, rather several
critical structural components. Otherwise—collapse would have been
Local, and limited.
Cause Must Be
Ascertained.
Mayors can
sign technical documents, but their signature typically serves as an Administrative Formality Or
Executive Authorization, rather than certifying the technical accuracy
of the content.
The signing
of technical documents is governed by strict parameters:
Technical
Approval: A mayor is typically may not be an engineer, architect, or
specialized technical expert. Technical accuracy, code compliance, and
structural integrity must be evaluated and signed off by certified, licensed
professionals within the respective Corporation/Municipal Department (e.g., the
Building, Public Works, or Engineering departments).
The
Engineering Department of Kolkata Corporation shall be ISO certified, if
already is not.
In this
system—there is an engineer, and also an Architect who performs, a senior
‘CHECKS’—and a more experienced Senior Engineer, at least with 15 years of
Domain Experience Approves For Construction and stamps
‘AFC’ or IFC.
Then the Drawing/Plan goes to Mayor’s table for ‘Executive Approval’.
Administrative/Executive
Approval: The mayor’s role in signing is usually to officially seal the Corporation/Municipal
Government's sanctioning of the project, commit public funds, and/or finalize
EUL/council approval.
Delegation
of Authority: Depending on local jurisdiction rules, Mayors frequently delegate
specific execution and contract approvals to the municipal commissioner, City
Manager, or Chief Executive Officer.
In this
particular case, following shall be reviewed in addition:
1.0 Whether the engineering team had
adequate ‘Domain Knowledge, and Experience’?
2.0 If yes, then they are guilty of
‘CRIMINAL NEGFLIGENCE’ causing death.
3.0 If NO, then who authorized them to
do the JOB? He is guilty.
4.0 If it is Material failure, was there
an approved ‘Material Specification’? If it is supplying lapse—then Supplier is
at liable.
5.0 Was there an ‘Approved Construction
Procedure’? If not,—C-in-C- is liable.
6.0 Was there a QA/QC procedure? Was
there a ‘Safety Officer’ at site, if it happened during execution? In all these
cases, C-in-C is liable.
Answer to
all of these is, and some more--are needed, before framing the ‘CHARGE’.
Mr. Kunal
Ghosh of TMC is trying to convert a Post Accident ‘TECNO-LEGAL’ matter into a
Political agenda!
NOTE:
Author is a Certified Chartered Engineer, M.Tech, and Civil Engineer with 55
years of experience.
Disclaimer:
Shared for information only.

The incident draws attention of engineers, as the failure seems to have happened for engineering design lapse or construction lapse or both and may a failure at the negligence of work quality or material quality or all put together. Nice of the blogger to have shared the information of collapse. The irony is that it has happened in Calcutta, where the industry at the very place introduced steel structural design and fabrication to the rest of India. A very sorry state of affairs. Had the practices followed by companies like Braithwait, Jessop, Burn standard, Chatterjee and Polk, MN Dastur & Co. and others been followed, this catastrophe would not have happened.
ReplyDeleteV K.Khanna, Gurugram - Civil/ Structural Engineer