CJP AGAINST BJP

 

CJP AGAINST BJP

SARASIJ MAJUMDER

 

I have been reflecting on the BJP's strategy regarding the 'Cockroach' movement—specifically, why they are proceeding so cautiously instead of taking an aggressive stance from the very beginning.

Let us analyze.

Consider the massive foreign funding behind this 'Cockroach' movement—the roles of George Soros and the United States. Then there was the BRICS summit, where Russia, China, and India came together, creating a potential cause of permanent damage to the DOLLAR economy.

I studied and analyzed BJP’s go-slow mode on this matter, and I am presenting some information to my readers in this BLOG. You see, the BJP's core strategy revolves around upcoming elections in several states with the Uttar Pradesh election being the most significant. While there are elections in many states before 2029, the Uttar Pradesh election is the most critical. If the BJP manages to improve upon there by relying on Yogi Adityanath, it wouldn't take them long to strike back effectively.

That may be a reason, why BJP is currently avoiding a direct conflict.

Instead, they are focusing their publicity on Narendra Modi's 25 years of governance and sticking to the strategy of attacking LoP over the issue of dynastic  corruption, and politics.

It also kept crossing in my mind that the BJP is already in power in over 21 states, so why this timid approach? Why aren't they taking a more aggressively confrontational path on the Gyanesh Kumar episode or the 'COCKROACH' movement?

There are primarily two reasons for this. Regarding the decision taken by the BJP's national leadership—which I am sharing with you—public involvement played a key role in the 'COCKROACH' movement that led to Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. By "PUBLIC," I mean common  people—the middle class, upper-middle class, and lower-middle class—educated individuals whose children took the NEET exam; they had become emotionally invested in that 'COCKROACH' movement, which ultimately forced Dharmendra Pradhan to step down.

Naturally, the 'COCKROACH' group got emboldened by that success.

You may recall Dipke’s exclamation next day after Mr. Pradhan’s resignation—

“​मामू , सुबह हो गया "!---- ‘It is Morning—Uncle’!

They shall not be allowed to witness a second morning!! Sun shall never again rise in their horizon!

Moreover, regarding the stance they have now taken on the issue of foreign funding—specifically concerning the demand for Gyanesh Kumar's resignation—the problem lies with the 'COCKROACH' group itself. Let me briefly explain why.

You see, the current movement against Gyanesh Kumar enjoys political backing—that is, support from political parties that are unable to come to power or have lost it in various states. For instance, the Trinamool Congress has lost power in West Bengal, got disintegrated,  and blame it on SIR.

Leftists are virtually wiped clean in various states. Consequently, these parties have their own vested interests. Meanwhile, the Congress party is unable to return to power, remained stuck with 99 MPs, and Rahul Gandhi is struggling to establish his leadership and identity within the INC, as well as in INDI—A. It is failing to gain any traction among the people of India. Gradually, the overall situation has reached at a HOPELESS JUNCTURE for the opposition. All political parties are attempting to stage a comeback by relying on support from this 'new-generation (GEN-G) cockroaches'.

I noticed yesterday that activity outside Mamata Banerjee's residence was being highlighted by TMC on social media; this is because they are trying to draw a bit of 'extra oxygen' from that movement—which is only natural.

Why is the BJP allowing this? The reason—and I reiterate again—is that the BJP's primary focus right now is the Uttar Pradesh election. While the Punjab election is significant, the BJP isn't aiming to win there, and BJP knows it can’t win in Punjab.  Aam Aadmi Party or Congress will likely prevail, may be in some combination, or alone.  Sardars will not vote for BJP. AKALI‘s betrays ensured it.

 BJP might see only marginal growth in Punjab.

But in the Uttar Pradesh election, the BJP simply must bounce back. Therefore, rather than adopting an aggressive stance, the BJP's central leadership and the central government have opted for a 'go-slow' approach: ensure a rift within the opposition and let the public become thoroughly fed up. Consider the states where these protests are taking place—such as the one at Shivaji Park in Mumbai; while ordinary people from the surrounding areas tolerated the situation on the first day, they are unlikely to put up with it on the second day. As I present this report, people have gathered in Bangalore—a Congress-ruled state—to hold protests and meetings. Meanwhile, over the past two days, protests have been unfolding in Delhi, with MPs staging demonstrations and Rahul Gandhi taking the lead; ultimately, a mega-rally is scheduled to be held in Delhi on the 10th—just a day or two away. Notice that the police are maintaining a largely peaceful stance—that is, rather than resorting to rough physical force, they are disbursing the crowd, and not  resorting to lathi-charges.

They aren't using batons; they aren't giving the opposition the kind of opening that can be encashed if the police were to lathi-charge, use water cannons, or fire tear gas.

That is something the detractors cannot claim has happened.

Consequently, in this context, keeping the Gyanesh Kumar episode alive—organizing 'people's conventions,' mobilizing NGOs, and leveraging media houses like the Ananda bazar Patrika group—is essentially an exercise fueled by foreign funding.

This is happening consistently and will continue to do so. Over and above, a certain segment of the intelligentsia—those aligned with the Congress’s ideology and who have opposed the BJP at various times—are finding it difficult to accept the reality of the BJP's rise (governing 21 states and holding 240 parliamentary seats). Unable to come to terms with this internally, they are now trying to re-emerge by highlighting the Gyanesh Kumar issue.

The central government's stance seems to be: "Let them come out and proceed." They anticipate that, over time, the common people will become alienated from this movement because the Gyanesh Kumar issue has no bearing on their lives, livelihoods, education, or healthcare.

What is the Gyanesh Kumar issue linked to?

It is linked to elections.

And aligning these electoral calculations with the interests of the common people is a very very difficult task. Take West Bengal, for instance. I am saying that the BJP is moving towards that same stance regarding West Bengal as well. Everyone across the state knows how Abhishek Banerjee won by a margin of 7,00,000 votes—allegedly through total electoral fraud. He will lose in next election!

I am sure  if Abhishek Banerjee makes any significant move now, the state-level BJP is prepared to bring the story behind that 7,00,000-vote margin out into the open; that decision has been made. Bobby the victim will be made active!

That is why I say—without giving it massive exposure at the Delhi level—the strategy is to attack the Congress; keep attacking the Congress.

And when attacking the Congress—specifically Rahul Gandhi—one must consider the issue of his personality, which is politically immature.

Yet, certain so-called pro-Congress media outlets—like the Ananda Bazar group—trying to build  him as a competent leader and statesman, projecting that only the Gandhi family can represent India to the world.

Those who subscribe to this mindset naturally try to promote Rahul Gandhi. However, he suffers from ‘SYNDROME OF MURKH KALIDAS!’  In English it may be called ‘Foot in the Mouth’ syndrome! Even his so-called patrons are beginning to realize this.

Just look at the kind of exposure *Ananda bazar Patrika* has showered on Neha Bora over the past two weeks. It implies that a leader like Neha is emerging as an alternative to Narendra Modi. They are trying to propagate this narrative.

Which organization does she lead?

AISA (All India Students Association)—a Naxalite-leaning group that has no real base here in West Bengal! They have some presence in Bihar and a few universities or colleges in Delhi, yet she is being projected as a future alternative to Narendra Modi. This is the kind of leadership being patronized. And aligning with this—or rather, merging with this—are certain so-called intellectuals who think they wield influence in society through their discourse. Take, for instance, Vishwanath Chakraborty—I mention his name not out of any personal disrespect—I saw him stating on television yesterday that a "majoritarian democracy" is being established. Well, what does democracy mean? As a student of political science, I know that in a democracy, the decision of the group with the greater numbers ultimately prevails. The very concept of “DEMOCRACY" inherently contains the element of “MAJORITY”. So, in a democracy, if no one wins, naturally, their right is not established. And there is no such thing as ‘Majoritarian Democracy’.

He was trying to convey, hinting at the fact—that within India's political system, there is an unstable arrangement. Let me share a small fact with you.

I mention this because I was analyzing his statement.

When these protests were taking place in Delhi, the Leftists were there alongside some 21, 22, or 23 political parties participating along with COCKROACHES. But how many political parties exist on Indian soil? Merely registering doesn't make one a political party having any electoral influence.  

We know that, ultimately, the decision of the side with the greater numbers prevails. The very term "majoritarian democracy" implies a majority. So, in a democracy, if one does not win, naturally, one's claim is not established.

For the sake of argument, suppose the BJP steps aside and a coalition government is formed at the national level—led by the Congress, Trinamool Congress, Akhilesh Yadav, and the Aam Aadmi Party.

Can you imagine what Pakistan would do?

Can you imagine what China would do? Can you imagine what the neighboring country, Bangladesh, might do?

If such a situation arises on Indian soil......Pakistan's ISI, all terrorists, Al-Qaeda groups, China, and the United States will love it!!

Would they restore its so-called 'rights,' effectively transforming Kashmir into an entity outside the Indian state?

If you observe closely, you will see it. I am only telling you what you can see.

I heard from journalist friends in Delhi that the figure has crossed 25,000 or 30,000 who participated in CJP lead movement. Can you imagine? They all go there posing as journalists, and money is being invested from abroad for their journey, stay and  to instantly boost the videos they upload. Who are funding Air Tickets, Hotel Bills? And why? Think please.

Has anyone spoken about this? Have you seen any discussion on ABP Ananda's hour-long shows regarding who is funding these people?

India's JAYCHANDS and MIRJAFARS are active! Some of them have failed in the past—the rest are seeing a failing future. That is why they were recruited by ENEMY OF INDIA!!!

BE CAREFUL! JAI HIND.